ABOUT THE NEWS HOLE

It's the new award-winning blog* from the cast and crew of the award-winning television news hour** "Countdown with Keith Olbermann."

We heard about this whole "blogosphere" business from Tom DeLay, and came to the immediate realization that we too, "needed to become involved" in it.

So here it is. Covering the big news, the small news, medium-sized and irregular, The News Hole strives to bring everything you love or hate about Countdown to the internets.

Your feedback and hate mail is encouraged.

*Countdown's "Best of the Web Awards" 2007
**The News Hole's "Best of the TV Awards" 2006



BROWN V. CAR BOMB

Posted: Friday, June 29, 2007 12:47 PM by Countdown

Some of what we're working on for tonight...

 

In his second full day in office, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown is dealing with his first crisis: a car bomb in Central London, not far from Picadilly Circus, that police were able to diffuse overnight. The timing, the BBC points out, comes not only in the wake of the transfer of power but also with the anniversary of the July 7 attacks approaching.


TURNING BACK HISTORY: 
Two things seem certain in the wake of yesterday’s Supreme Court decision to overturn Brown v. Board of Ed., the Justices having ruled that schools can no longer use race as a factor in fighting – of all things – discrimination: That Justice Anthony Kennedy is the court’s new key swing vote, and that late Chief Justice Earl Warren is rolling over in his grave.


RACE AND THE RACE: The Supreme Court ruling, coincidentally falling on the same day as the first presidential debate designed to focus on minority issues. Of course, the train wreck quotient would have been a lot higher had the Republicans been debating instead of the Democrats.  Senator Barack Obama pointed out that he owed his entire candidacy to affirmative action: "If it were not for them,” he said “I would not be standing here." But reporters in attendance say that, once again, Senator Hillary Clinton
drew the biggest response, for her observation that AIDS had hit young African-American women particularly hard: “If HIV-AIDS were the leading cause of death of white women between the ages of 25 and 34” the former first lady said, “There would be an outraged, outcry in this country."


STOPPING THE WAR, TAKE TWO: The folks at the Politico report that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid are poised to announce another “coordinated effort” to end
the war in Iraq by forcing votes on the issue throughout July. Countdown would like to point out, in
advance, that voting would not seem to be the problematic portion of any Democratic effort on Iraq.
It’s actually having a spine once the White House starts threatening vetoes on said legislation and
otherwise bad-mouthing the Democrats.

WEB OF INTRIGUE:  So if pro wrestler Chris Benoit didn’t change his Wikipedia entry to mention his wife’s death – hours before authorities discovered the body and that of their seven-year-old son – who did? Just the latest development in a story as fascinating as it is heart-breakingly sad.

MAIN PAGE

Email this EMAIL THIS

Comments

Gee ya all are slow today. I posted this in another blog but since if fits here, I'm reposting it if you let me :D
When is Tony Blair leaving office? hmmm another foiled terrorist BS. Don't think that this country and England are not in it together. Also I laugh when I see this crap. The People in Our White House, are in trouble and sent an SOS to England. Got to keep everyone in fear and mad, so they can continue with their lied about wars. If someone can't see this then I feel really sorry for them.
Why are Pelosi and Reid trying to do something in July when the Administration's waiting for Petraeus' magical September Report?  

That makes a lot of sense: after giving a man with a 28% approval rating all he wanted in the wake of the elections, how will they expect to get anything done now?

No wonder Congress' approval rating is lower than Bush's.
Stopping the War, Take Two: Ditto Countdown. Nothing to do with getting the votes and everything to do with spine. Thanks for supporting what I have stated about this issue all along Countdown in response to those who whine "but the Dems can't get the votes". Oh my, lions, tigers and bears. Screw the votes. Send the bill , let Bush veto, send it back, let him veto, send it back again, and again, and again, and again.  
Hey Hillary, If, If  If,  If a bullfrog had wings he wouldn't bump his ass everytime he jumped. If the Queen had balls she'd be King. If you weren't such a bitch Bill wouldn't have to stalk every woman he comes in contact with. If these black women were more responsible ......and so on. How about put the responsibility where it belongs, with the individual. The White House did not cause the rise of AIDS in black women. Very irresponsible for a so called legitimate candidate.
Hi. Another brief point to add to the above paragraph concerning yesterday's Supreme Court decision is the fact that at the time of Brown VS. Board of Education, William Renquist was a clerk or worked for the Court in some capacity at the time, and he wrote and published a SCATHING SCARY opinion of the Brown decision. My professor in one of my constitutional law classes in college read it to us, and it was frightening. So, Justice Renquist may be dancing a jig wherever he is.

I already posted by thoughts about last night's Democratic debate in the previous thread, so you're welcome to read them there.

And, to whomever wrote the brilliant thoughts above in "Stopping the War, Take Two," you deserve a pat on the back, a hearty handshake, and the warm glow of victory. GREAT JOB!
Is Mr. Bush trying to tell Mr. Brown something?
How about a new piece on Al Gore?  A new poll of New Hampshire has him winning the primary and he is not even running. That is huge news.  Why isn't it getting any press.
I liken this congress to a skilled, albeit not very powerful fighter.  The first exit strategy bill getting vetoed was just a jab that got parried.  Voting down the President's emmigration bill was one that landed.  The next “coordinated effort” will just be a jab, and will probably will not land.  Eventually, the opponent will weaken, and we may see a lot of staggering around the ring.  Of course, the real sockdollager is scheduled for November, 2008.  I will enjoy watching them as they realize that it's coming, they can't do anything about it, and they brought it upon themselves.
Hey, Kieth, I have your opening remarks tonight...

"We begin our countdown tonight by re-airing a piece from about a month ago, which will make sense to our current situation within about 15 seconds," then instead of using the number 15, you can add number 16 to the chart, VP Cheney gets grilled by the Washington Post instantly breeds yet another Terror plot foiled.  How surprising.
Mao-Nixonism requires that the Indigeous Minorities as well as the Mysoginal Majority, be subjugated.  This requires overturning Brown v. Board of Edu. and Roe v. Wade. The Vietnamization of America, per the Nixon Memo, is ahead of Schedule.  As a side benefit, the Cheap Chinese Chrysler is coming soon!
Hey Hillary, a new NBC poll says 52% of the voters won't vote for you no matter what. Good luck in 08. lol
Yeah, terrorism.  Make 'em scared again.  Let's get Rudy out there talking 9/11.  Scare 'em some more.  Our guy Tony Snow and our guys in radio and Fox News can maybe make a connection right back here in the US of A.  Scaring 'em works better than them missing pretty white women and celebrities taking over the news.  After all, they only cover 1 story at a time and that Paris Hilton story is getting a little old.

Yeah, that'll distract those pesky media guys.  They won't report on that letter we got from Conyers and Leahy demanding those documents we've been hiding ....  er ..... covering up ...... er....... deleting ..... er ...... classifying ...er... using executive power to prevent access.  Yeah, they want them by 7/9 or they'll take action Congressional action.  

Yeah, no time for them to report on how we lost that Immigration Bill too.  And then they won't report on how some of our guys in Congress are kind of mad at  our radio guys getting their listeners riled up on the wrong side of our issues.

Yeah, they won't report on what our other guys guys ... er .... the Supreme Court ... yeah, them .... are doing in overturning Brown v. Board of Education and all those other decisions they made to overturn those other decisions of the Supremes that we don't like.

Yeah, deflect, distort and distract.  That's what we do best.  Yeah, it's Friday too - TGIF - time to bury the news in the load of trash that's going out today.  Nobody pays attention to the news on Fridays or the weekend.  We'll make up for it on Sunday when we get all our guys on all those Sunday news shows.  

Karl Rove
on an undisclosed mail server
in an undisclosed location
being guarded to prevent subpoena delivery
this message will self destruct on all servers and mailboxes after being read


Jamie - a response to you from your post on Dick's Move which has fallen off the list.  Reposted here:

Jamie - you're not a flea - the fleas are those pesky Kool Aid Drinkers that can only spew out loyal GOP talking points.  I suggest that people not scratch at them because they multiply when scratched.

I hope you weren't taking my flea or circus clown posts to include you.  They don't and never have been.
Congratulations to this Supreme Court on it's excellent decision. Everyone deserves an equal opportunity. It is not right for one group to have an advantage over another. Admission should be on academic qualities not color of skin. Competition makes a better person. May I suggest those not academically qualified to go to college seek other opportunities and let motivated qualified ones move this country forward.
The first freaking post! I knew it would happen, but the first post?

Must have been agents of the Vice President. Distract us from goings on in DC. Please.
London bomb scare after a week of PAINFULLY bad press for the Commander-in-Cheney?  Break out the Nexus, part III.
You have got to be kidding me!  Hillary and the other pres. candidates go to Howard University – an all black college – and complain about the Supreme Court Ruling?  Did they look around and see any white faces in the student body?    Then Hillary blames white women for aids in the black community??  If I didn’t know these were progressive liberals I would think it was a Saturday night live joke.  Do you guys really want these people to run the country…  Wait, don’t answer that.
Some Rush Olbermann fans actually believe the London Car Bomb story is actually a distraction from Bush Administration woes, CHECK. COUNTDOWN is critical of the racial diversity of the gaggle of Republican Presidential Candidates, CHECK.  Too bad MSNBC show anchor's racial diveristy seems just as homogenous.  Oh and how about Rush Olbermann's guests?  ALways white as the driven snow.  Racial diversity does not seem to be a priority for COUNTDOWN either.
Yeah, it's a good distraction---"Have fun on the fourth, just don't forget someone out there is trying to kill you and your family in the most painful way possible!"---what no one saw was that, while the car(s) were Homer Simpsoning their way into the Doofus Hall of Fame, the only two bases the Brits have in Iraq were attacked.  They screwed that one up too.  This is more about scaring Brown into doing a post-train Spain than about the good ole US of A.
Gee whiz Larry in SC, I wonder wwhat % won't vote for any Republican candidate? Got those numbers handy? Or is Fox News only providing you with the Anti-Hillary numbers?
From the desk of Karl Rove

To Dick Cheney

It has come to my attention that too few Americans care what happens in Britain for the latest foiled terrorist plot to be an effective distraction from the current domestic crisis we are experiencing here at the White House, and you, in your undisclosed non-executive branch location.

Therefore I have been monitoring television broadcasts (legal surveilance unless someone finds out I am using an illegal Dish TV descrambler), to ascertain what it is that actually concerns most Americans.  My research has revealed a trend.  An overwhelming amount of television time is devoted to a girl named Paris Hilton (photo attached).

This gave me the idea that maybe we should schedule a news conference, write a tightly controlled script for George, and announce that we have uncovered a plot by Islamic extremists, with ties to Al Queda, to bomb Paris (Hilton).

Let me know what you think.  We could always leave George out of the loop and hand this one to Tony to do his usual routine and implicate David Gregory in the plot.

Your Humble Subject, Karl
I’m willing to open betting on the identity of the group who set the car bomb in London.  Who’s going to bet on the Christian radicals?  
Did anybody see what Coulter told O'riley last night? She said that she hopes Edwards get killed by terorists. Does that make any sence anymore? Does even get what she said? she HOPES he get killed during an terrorist attack means that has do be another terrorist attach in the USA right. And she hopes for that? O' Riley didn't do anything, are guy's in the media so taken by her that none of them put her in her place? Now you can get fired for maken racial remakes but saying that she hopes we have another terrorist attack so Edwards get killed is ok? I been watching all day for somebody to say anything about it. But either you all missed it or you agree with her. Which one is it here?
You can't compromise with lying, dishonorable, traitorous cowards, Bush will continue to stall as long as there's a profit to be made in Iraq. Stop the funding now, or a lot of people like me will vote independent.

Might be the IRA Scott. Time will tell
SHHHHH!  don't anybody tell Larry Charleston that Hillary doesn't read this.
LOL. I'm sorry, but I do have to laugh at the last post by Scott-NV betting on what group was responsible for setting the bomb in London. I'm laughing because I knew before it was posted that Scott would move right in with that one. I'm not saying I agree but slick Scott, very slick. What a world.
jkeenan: Interesting thought came to mind when I read your post about voting percentages. I wonder what would happen if no one, I mean absolutely no one but perhaps the candidates themselves, showed up to vote on election day because the chocies were so bad. Would that not be a hoot. It would be a tie 1 - 1 unless of course one of the idiots through some weird sense of sympathy or due to over confidence voted for the other person. I would love to see their faces as they sat with their families in the hotel suite on election night, all the press would be there to film their reactions to the returns, and no returns came in. What a hoot. Of course this would never happen because of all those brain dead folks out there that always and strictly vote only along party lines no matter who is running.
Scott.  You mean, of course, the Irish Republican Army, right?  Y'know, Patriot Games?
Bill Rochester NY (Sent Friday, June 29, 2007 5:06 PM)  I'll chalk you up for IRA, they haven't been that active lately but I think they are more effective.


C.A.  I just couldn’t help myself, the devil sitting on my right shoulder won over the angel on the left.  I had to re-word it to get past the censors, who I have to admit were probably correct in rejecting my original.
Steve Turner Cedar Falls Iowa (Sent Friday, June 29, 2007 5:43 PM)

Darn, wish I saw this befor posting my last.  O.K. Steve that makes two for the IRA.  I think I'll make a killing on this book.  
I would like to begin with stating I do not wish to offend anyone on here.  I have been reading this blog for many, many months now.  I felt a need to contribute to this dialogue today as it relates to what has now become a primary focus of today’s discussion, the "resignation" of Independent from this blog.

I will start with the following, “Trust magnates were superior to law” (Gustavus Myers)

Upon reviewing this morning’s posts, I read Independent’s last post, directed at Jamie.  It was most disturbing to me.  Having read multiple posts from all of you, I have enjoyed such benefits of entertainment, informative discussion, and lively debate and have also read many insults and negative attacks back and forth.

Independent, you have been guilty of this many times, although through your words to Jamie, it is apparent you do recognize these actions. Somewhere along the line, and as you became a daily blogger, you began frequently addressing the behavior of others.  You took this to a level which I found hypocritical, both for the aforementioned reasons, in addition to your devoted efforts at protecting our Constitution.  I believe the First Amendment addresses such.  By acting as you have, you have attempted to strip all those you addressed of their First Amendment right.  If you had limited your opinions to one or two posts, I could have just let it go.  On the contrary, you have continued to request that people stop writing in a manner you do not like.  You have made every possible effort to prevent other bloggers, to include both Scott and Larry, from excercising their First Amendment rights.  

This is hypocrisy, as you cannot champion the Constitution, while leveling condescending comments to others who write what they chose to write, no matter how “wrong” or “hateful” their comments are.  You also cannot fight for the Constitution while telling those who respond to such hate-filled speech “there tone is wrong”, "do not reply", etc.  This is not only hypocrisy at it’s greatest, it also shows it is you, not Jamie, who has a deep-rooted perception of superiority.

Sue has been the sole blogger who has remained true to her statements of ignoring those who bother her, as she does not respond to either side.  She also does not critique the behavior of others, which is also a sign of superiority.  Sue is the only one, from what I have read, who has walked her talk.  You certainly have not.  

You have continued to affect an attitude on this blog, which is in no way your right.  You do not surpass anyone here in rank or quality, nor are you an authority on this blog.  You accused Jamie, through her writing and opinions, of being superior; yet it has been you who has displayed a personal sense of greater value and excellence on this blog.  You cannot let anything go, and you refuse to accept Sue’s advice and just pass over those people you find offensive.

You came to New Hole several months ago; your posts were educational, informative and humorous. You also chose to engage with and respond to both Scott and Larry; although I haven’t seen Larry posting lately, and your responses did include negative attacks , abusive language and you displayed a continued need to keep a subject going until you felt you had won, taking days some times.  Yes, Independent, the very reasons you have given for “resigning” from the blog, you have been guilty of, and for quite some time. Your comments to Jamie were out of line, i.e. “you are the reason I’m leaving…"you were the final straw,”...“you feel you are superior,”, etc. In my opinion, that was one of the most hate-filled diatribes I have read on this blog.  

A few days back, in Sue’s words, “a flea” stated, “you are all too serious”.  I laughed at the time.  His words now ring true.

In closing, I am grateful for everyone here, including you Independent. I ask you please take this advice, “gratitude alone can keep you looking toward the All, and prevent you from falling into the error of thinking of the supply as limited; and to do that would be fatal to your hopes.”  While you may disagree with people’s thinking and behavior, I choose to be grateful for everyone here; as those whose opinions I disagree with have kept me focused on my beliefs and goals. I am also grateful for Jamie, and perhaps I read her writing differently that you, as I haven’t felt her to be offensive, or having any sense of superiority at all.  
C A -  Your election night scenario would indeed be hilarious except I think we both know what would really happen:  They'd make up numbers.  Just like Florida does in every election.  That does not change that it would be very funny.  I've been to a couple of election night events, some that went well, some not so well, some R and some D, but a total no show from voters?  Before they started making up numbers there would be a whole lotta whining and hitting the open bar.  Very funny whining.  

"Martha!  Get me a scotch!  Those damn plebeians don't know how good we let them have it!  Not ONE vote!  I'll show them!  We'll make Chip's dog Senator for this district!  Martha!  Call Maria and tell her we'll be home early.  Tell her we'll turn her into the INS if the yacht isn't waxed when we get home!  And tell her to quit burning to toast to look like . . . like . . . I think they are supposed to be Saints, but I swear the one looked like that Charles Manson.  Is he the one with the swastika on his forehead?  Martha!  Where is MY scotch?"
If this is a legitimate terror attack attempt, why isn't anybody bringing up the fact that Bush and his cronies just keep telling everyone that "we are fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here" - so wouldn't that apply to Britain as well since they are "over there" with us?  

This administration has fu**ed up the war in Iraq from the beginning; they invaded a country that never attacked us, had no WMD's and no association with Al Quaida, and no exit strategy or alternate plans if, say a civil war broke out.  Yet Congress still allows Bush to be in the driver's seat and steer our troops, not to mention the rest of our country, into hell.  It's like a neighbor we had many years ago.  His teenager, a NEW, INEXPERIENCED, NAIVE, "I know everything" driver was presented with a brand new car when he passed his driver's test.  He proceeded to wreck it.  So they did the only logical thing; they bought him another.  What happened then?  You guessed it - another accident totaling yet another car.  And yes; they bought him a third.  We moved away after that so who knows how many times they gave this kid the opportunity to wreck yet another vehicle with no consequences for his actions.  Sound familiar?

My husband is now in the war in Iraq and also has been to Afghanistan.  He said when they first went (and this applies to both war zones) the kids would stand by the side of the road and wave.  Now the kids stand by the side of the road and flip them the bird.  This administration just keeps wrecking the car and Congress continues to hand over another set of keys in the form of additional funding with no oversight.  How many cars...in this case how many young military men and women and innocent Iraqis have to die before we stop handing Bush yet another set of keys?    
Pam (from earlier thread) - You don't owe me an apology for anything, Pam.  You are, in fact, owed an apology.  Just not by me.  For that, I am sorry.  You feel free to explain me anytime you wish. Explaining is what you were doing too, not defending.  That was what I read anyway.  Just know that I am a freak magnet (ok, so sometimes I flush them out) and you may get bit again.  You know that if you put words in my mouth I don't like the taste of, I'll take them right out.  But no apology is required.
You know, I don't even know what is going on here. I am not going to get involved in the war amongst people who post here. I'm just going to say two things: a) I think racist statements implying that black women are responsible for getting AIDS on their own shouldn't be welcome here; b) to the Countdowners, the bomb was not "diffused," it was "defused." "Diffuse" is to spread something over a wide area, which is exactly what you DON'T want to do with a bomb. "Defuse" is to disconnect the fuse and keep the bomb from exploding. That's the word you want. You're welcome. And yes, I am a wiseass, but if you doubt I'm right, ask Keith; he'll tell you.
Larry in Charleston--and if you weren't so convinced that black women are promiscuous, you'd probably realize that the reason that AIDS/HIV is prevalent among them is the number of bisexual and homosexual black males who infect their partners--partners who think they are in a monogamous relationship.

Please try doing a little something called reading and research.  I am generalizing here, but black women are discouraged by their churches, which they are very active in, from using birth control—particularly, condoms.  Black men who are gay or bisexual are discouraged by churches and the community from living openly.  Women do not know that their partners are gay or bisexual, they think they are in monogamous relationships and believe that condom use is a sign of promiscuity.  These things were once true for white women, and at that time, about the worst thing they faced was syphilis and blind children.  There was, by the way, an outcry and something was done—this is why we have blood tests today.

Seriously--do you people screen these things at all?  My postings frequently don't go up, but Larry's rants do.  Are you interested in informing people, or are you interested in drama like our friend, O'Reilly?

By the way, I don't know who writes the blogs--but you people could use some remedial writing classes--it's "defuse" not "diffuse."
Brown vs. Car Bomb: another government sponsored terrorist act, just like the ones in this country which are "discovered" and "foiled".  Just wait for the spin to find out which opinion the mainstream media would like us to have.  Is this foiled plot good for Gordon or bad for Gordon?

Nancy Pelosi ..."we have the support of the American people."  Not with a Congressional approval rating in the mid to low twenties, ya don't, lady!  Who does she think she's bullshitting?
Scott.  A "Killing" off that book?  Would that be a "Radical Christian Killing"?  Just curious.
Right ON SUE!!!!!
Thanks Keith.  I just watched Guilianni take more credit for 9/11 (in which he participated in), and then Bolton talk his crap, feeding Americans the same message of WMDs and fear.  Most Americans don't realize that ALL of these stories have been basically hoaxes.  These govmts. are still subjecting Americans, based on fear instead of facts, to not being able to carry on-board shampoo, even after it has been proven that this liquid bomb "terrorist act" has been disproven.

Keep up the great work, and know that 9/11 was the catalyst for G.W. Scherff's war on America and the fullfillment of PNAC (http://www.newamericancentury.org)

Wake up Americans, are kids are never leaving the middle east, because of operation iraqi liberation (OIL) as the president first stated.

Ron Paul for President.

Peace.
Thanks Keith.  I just watched Guilianni take more credit for 9/11 (in which he participated in), and then Bolton talk his crap, feeding Americans the same message of WMDs and fear.  Most Americans don't realize that ALL of these stories have been basically hoaxes.  These govmts. are still subjecting Americans, based on fear instead of facts, to not being able to carry on-board shampoo, even after it has been proven that this liquid bomb "terrorist act" has been disproven.

Keep up the great work, and know that 9/11 was the catalyst for G.W. Scherff's war on America and the fullfillment of PNAC (http://www.newamericancentury.org)

Wake up Americans, are kids are never leaving the middle east, because of operation iraqi liberation (OIL) as the president first stated.

Ron Paul for President.

Peace.
R, Northern California, Congress do have the people here behind them, Only if they do what we have been asking for! But there should be NO DELAY in getting the troops out of Iraq, they can all spew about how getting out would be a tragedy, we did it in Nam. Until they actually Impeach Bush and his co-horts along with getting us out of Iraq and getting our rights back they are in the dog house!
Todd - THANK YOU!! I know you understood, and I was sincerely thought I was being kind to “ya”. But “ya”got his pants in a wad for whatever reason!! You certainly don't owe me an apology either.  I tried my best to explain to "ya" after his post and also apologized twice; however "ya" seems to want continue ranting so I'm done.

As I said, I cleaned up my side of the street and "ya" has every right to keep his panties in a wad!!

Also, I enjoy your posts, you are a scholar, you are a defender of our Constitution and if “ya” doesn’t see that, it’s “ya’s” loss!! I DID mean everything good I sad about you to "ya” !!

PEACE FRIEND!!
Todd - THANK YOU!! I know you understood, and I sincerely thought I was being kind to “ya”. But “ya”got his panties in a wad for whatever reason!! You certainly don't owe me an apology either.  I tried my best to explain to "ya" after the “response” and also apologized twice; however "ya" seems to want continue ranting so I'm done.

As I said, I cleaned up my side of the street and "ya" has every right to keep his panties in a wad!!  

Also, I enjoy your posts, you are a scholar, you are a defender of our Constitution and if “ya” doesn’t see that, it’s “ya’s” loss!! I DID mean everything good I sad about you to "ya”!!

PEACE FRIEND!!
What is it about canvas sided Trailers? Is it that metal sided trailers aren't photogenic enough?

I was a bit flabbergasted when they pulled the dark canvas back from the "WMD" trailers so the whole show looked like a rock & roll stage, just right for the cameras.

Now the roll a car that was supposedly rigged to explode into another canvas sided trailer snd pull the canvas back for a good view!

What better way to create actual problems than to put a fake bomb where it could be seen and then a real one to go off when the car is moved! that would call for a bomb proof trailer. Not a canvas one with the sides rolled back for the photographers. Sounds like another fire at the Reichstag to me.

http://freedemocrat.blogspot.com/2006/04/stupider-than-screen-sided-submarines.html#links
Stupider than Screen Sided Submarines
Tru and Amy I am really confused.  I would like to understand more precisely why black women have a higher incidence of aids than white women?  Amy you appear to be blaming it on religion, do you not believe in personal responsibility and somehow  Christianity is responsibility.  We are not a theocracy, we do not have police enforcing religious doctrines like the Saudis.  So maybe you can be more precise on how religion is enforcing their morality.  A better understanding of why might help the solution, but I’m not sure a solution is what you want.  You want to place blame on the administration and will use what ever vehicle available, including the president’s faith.

Steve, the term "book" can be a slang term for taking bets with fixed odds on a proposition i.e. “bookie”.  I live in Nevada and the term is somewhat universally recognized here.   I may not have used it correctly as I didn’t specify the odds, but I doubt I could collect and thought I could use the term somewhat liberally.  


By the way, I don't know who writes the blogs--but you people could use some remedial writing classes--it's "defuse" not "diffuse."
Amy, Oklahoma (Sent Friday, June 29, 2007 7:59 PM)

I was in awe of your post until your final sentence, which I copied and pasted above. Does it make you feel superior, or better than the rest here to insult those who may not write as well as you?  Well, please excuse us illiterate writers on this blog Ms. Pulitzer!!

I find it odd that you “don't know who writes the blogs” However, perhaps if you were not so obsessed with analyzing commas or periods, Ms. Spelling Bee Champion,  you would take some time and look underneath the post, as you would find a name associated with its author.  

Perhaps Countdown has not allowed several of your posts on the blog because they are offensive, as was your degradation of those who write here!!

Since it is apparent you feel we are beneath your level of literacy, in lieu of posting here, might I suggest you read "Miss Manners", or perhaps take a course at the "Emily Post Institute".
By the way, I don't know who writes the blogs--but you people could use some remedial writing classes--it's "defuse" not "diffuse."
Amy, Oklahoma (Sent Friday, June 29, 2007 7:59 PM)

I was in awe of your post until your final sentence, which I copied and pasted above. Does it make you feel superior, or better than the rest here to insult those who may not write as well as you?  Well, please excuse us illiterate writers on this blog Ms. Pulitzer!!

I find it odd that you “don't know who writes the blogs” However, perhaps if you were not so obsessed with analyzing commas or periods, Ms. Spelling Bee Champion,  you would take some time and look underneath the post, as you would find a name associated with its author.  

Perhaps Countdown has not allowed several of your posts on the blog because they are offensive, as was your degradation of those who write here!!

Since it is apparent you feel we are beneath your level of literacy, in lieu of posting here, might I suggest you read "Miss Manners", or perhaps take a course at the "Emily Post Institute".
Scott.  Same question, emphasis on the 'Killing'.  Would that be a 'Radical Christian Killing'?  Just curious, like my bookie.


SEND A COMMENT

PLEASE READ: All comments must be approved before appearing in the thread; time and space constraints prevent all comments from appearing. We will only approve comments that are directly related to the blog, use appropriate language and are not attacking the comments of others.

Message (please, no HTML tags. Web addresses will be hyperlinked):

TRACKBACKS

Trackbacks are links to weblogs that reference this post. Like comments, trackbacks do not appear until approved by us. The trackback URL for this post is: http://thenewshole.msnbc.msn.com/trackback.aspx?PostID=249727

Syndicate This Site

Add The News Hole to your news reader:
live.com xml
myyahoo msn
bloglines newsgator
google